In this presentation, Greg Hanley discusses contemporary functional assessment and analytic decision-making within applied behavior analysis. Emphasis is placed on conducting a structured analysis interview, described as an acronym-based process that informs subsequent analytic procedures. The presenter highlights the importance of identifying problem behavior efficiently, noting that control over relevant variables is often achieved within approximately 25 minutes and without overlap across conditions. A clear distinction is made between analytic work and emotional reactivity; practitioners are cautioned not to allow sessions to escalate unnecessarily and to remain technically focused rather than personal.

The presentation also addresses the process of replacing problem behavior with what is described as “double better” responding, underscoring the need for meaningful and functionally relevant alternatives. Social validation is referenced as a necessary component, including directly asking stakeholders whether they are satisfied with outcomes. Broader professional issues are discussed, including limitations in hiring and training within the field and the importance of behavior analysts maintaining their role as variable analysts rather than assuming responsibilities outside their scope. Throughout, the speaker reinforces analytic rigor, professional boundaries, and humane implementation.